MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5935/1808-8694.20130083

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2013

Prognostic factors in sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a retrospective study using interaction effects.

Cho Chin-Saeng, Choi Young-Jin

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: The prognostic significance of vertigo in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) remains a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to verify the difference between a group with vertigo and a group without vertigo, and to analyze vertigo's validation as a prognostic factor in patients with SSNHL.

METHOD: This study involved 183 patients with SSNHL. A t-test was used to compare group A (SSNHL with vertigo, n = 31) and group B (SSNHL without vertigo, n = 152). Also we want to verify the interaction effects between vertigo and other prognostic factors using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between group A and group B: the initial hearing level of group A was lower than group B, and their treatment onset was also shorter. In addition, vertigo itself didn't affect hearing improvement, but the interaction variable between vertigo and initial hearing level did affect hearing improvement significantly.

CONCLUSION

The clinical characteristics of patients with vertigo did not directly affect hearing improvement with SSNHL; however, vertigo had an influence on SSNHL though its interaction with the initial hearing levels.

Для цитирования: Cho Chin-Saeng, Choi Young-Jin. Prognostic factors in sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a retrospective study using interaction effects.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2013. DOI: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130083.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.