Brain injury · 2018
Variable saline resuscitation in a murine model of combined traumatic brain injury and haemorrhage.
СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jung Andrew, Johnson Mark, Veile Rosalie, Friend Lou Ann, Stevens-Topie Sabre, Elterman Joel, Pritts Timothy, Makley Amy, Goodman Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Resuscitation strategies for combined traumatic brain injury (TBI) with haemorrhage in austere environments are not fully established. Our aim was to establish the effects of various saline concentrations in a murine model of combined TBI and haemorrhage, and identify an effective resuscitative strategy for the far-forward environment.
METHODS: Male C57BL/6 mice underwent closed head injury and subjected to controlled haemorrhage to a systolic blood pressure of 25 mmHg via femoral artery cannulation for 60 min. Mice were resuscitated with a fixed volume bolus or variable volumes of fluid to achieve a systolic blood pressure goal of 80 mmHg with 0.9% saline, 3% saline, 0.1-mL bolus of 23.4% saline, or a 0.1-mL bolus of 23.4% saline followed by 0.9% saline (23.4+).
RESULTS: 23.4% saline and 23.4+ resulted in higher mortality at 6 h compared to 0.9% saline. Use of 3% saline required less volume to achieve targeted resuscitation, did not affect survival, and did not exacerbate post-traumatic inflammation. While 23.4+ resuscitation utilized lower volume, it resulted in hypernatremia, azotemia, and elevated systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines. All groups except 3% saline demonstrated progression of neuron damage, with cerebral oedema highest with 0.9% saline.
CONCLUSIONS: 3% saline demonstrated favourable balance of survival, blood pressure restoration, minimization of inflammation, and prevention of ongoing neurologic injury without contributing to significant physiologic derangements. 23.4% saline administration may not be appropriate in the setting of concomitant hypotension.
METHODS: Male C57BL/6 mice underwent closed head injury and subjected to controlled haemorrhage to a systolic blood pressure of 25 mmHg via femoral artery cannulation for 60 min. Mice were resuscitated with a fixed volume bolus or variable volumes of fluid to achieve a systolic blood pressure goal of 80 mmHg with 0.9% saline, 3% saline, 0.1-mL bolus of 23.4% saline, or a 0.1-mL bolus of 23.4% saline followed by 0.9% saline (23.4+).
RESULTS: 23.4% saline and 23.4+ resulted in higher mortality at 6 h compared to 0.9% saline. Use of 3% saline required less volume to achieve targeted resuscitation, did not affect survival, and did not exacerbate post-traumatic inflammation. While 23.4+ resuscitation utilized lower volume, it resulted in hypernatremia, azotemia, and elevated systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines. All groups except 3% saline demonstrated progression of neuron damage, with cerebral oedema highest with 0.9% saline.
CONCLUSIONS: 3% saline demonstrated favourable balance of survival, blood pressure restoration, minimization of inflammation, and prevention of ongoing neurologic injury without contributing to significant physiologic derangements. 23.4% saline administration may not be appropriate in the setting of concomitant hypotension.