Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2019

Prognostic factors in patients with soft palate squamous cell carcinoma.

Schernberg Antoine, Canova Charles, Blanchard Pierre, Gorphe Philippe, Breuskin Ingrid, Mirghani Haitham, Moya-Plana Antoine, Janot François, Bidault Francois, Chargari Cyrus, Bellefqih Sara, Ruffier Amandine, Even Caroline, Nguyen France, Temam Stéphane, Tao Yungan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To define the prognostic factors associated with outcome in patients with soft palate squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with soft palate and uvula SCC treated in our institution between 1997 and 2012 were collected. The prognostic value of clinical, hematological, and treatment characteristics was examined.

RESULTS

We identified 156 patients, median age 58 years, with 71% drinkers, 91% smokers; 19% had synchronous cancer. Front-line treatment was chemoradiotherapy in 58 (37%), radiotherapy alone in 60 (39%), surgery in 17 (11%), and induction chemotherapy in 21 patients (14%). The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 41% and 37%, respectively. In univariate analysis, T3-T4 vs T1-T2 stage, N2-N3 vs N0-N1 stage, and neutrophil count >7 g/L were associated with worse OS and PFS (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with soft palate SCC, inflammation biomarkers were associated with OS.

Для цитирования: Schernberg Antoine, Canova Charles, Blanchard Pierre, Gorphe Philippe, Breuskin Ingrid, Mirghani Haitham, Moya-Plana Antoine, Janot François, Bidault Francois, Chargari Cyrus, Bellefqih Sara, Ruffier Amandine, Even Caroline, Nguyen France, Temam Stéphane, Tao Yungan. Prognostic factors in patients with soft palate squamous cell carcinoma.. Head & neck. 2019. DOI: 10.1002/hed.25598.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации

Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление

Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.