Aviation, space, and environmental medicine · 2006
G-induced loss of consciousness: retrospective survey results from 2259 military aircrew.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Green Nicholas D C, Ford Steven A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Prevalence of G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC) in the United Kingdom Royal Air Force (RAF) was found to be 19.3% in 1987. With the introduction of the Typhoon, a fourth generation aircraft, the prevalence of G-LOC has been re-assessed to determine the effectiveness of current G tolerance training.
METHOD: A survey was sent to 4018 RAF aircrew, irrespective of their current role. Information was requested on G-LOC, role and aircraft type, experience, and attitudes toward G-LOC prevention.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 2259 (56.2%) individuals, 882 (39%) of whom were current fast jet aircrew. At least one episode of G-LOC was reported by 20.1% of all respondents. In front line aircraft, prevalence of G-LOC among the 882 fast jet aircrew who responded was 6%. In the whole group, G-LOC was reported most commonly in aircrew under training (70.9%), and was most prevalent in training aircraft (77.4% of G-LOC events). At the time of the G-LOC, 64% of aircrew had less than 100 h total flying time. G-LOC was reported most frequently between +5 to +5.9 Gz, and "push-pull" maneuvers were associated with 31.3% of G-LOC events. Pulling G was not considered a problem by 50.6% of respondents, although over 80% recognized the value of flying currency, use of an anti-G suit, and physical fitness, and 55.6% felt that centrifuge training would be valuable.
DISCUSSION: The prevalence of G-LOC in the RAF has changed little since 1987, and there remains considerable scope for aircrew education, particularly with the introduction of the Typhoon.
METHOD: A survey was sent to 4018 RAF aircrew, irrespective of their current role. Information was requested on G-LOC, role and aircraft type, experience, and attitudes toward G-LOC prevention.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 2259 (56.2%) individuals, 882 (39%) of whom were current fast jet aircrew. At least one episode of G-LOC was reported by 20.1% of all respondents. In front line aircraft, prevalence of G-LOC among the 882 fast jet aircrew who responded was 6%. In the whole group, G-LOC was reported most commonly in aircrew under training (70.9%), and was most prevalent in training aircraft (77.4% of G-LOC events). At the time of the G-LOC, 64% of aircrew had less than 100 h total flying time. G-LOC was reported most frequently between +5 to +5.9 Gz, and "push-pull" maneuvers were associated with 31.3% of G-LOC events. Pulling G was not considered a problem by 50.6% of respondents, although over 80% recognized the value of flying currency, use of an anti-G suit, and physical fitness, and 55.6% felt that centrifuge training would be valuable.
DISCUSSION: The prevalence of G-LOC in the RAF has changed little since 1987, and there remains considerable scope for aircrew education, particularly with the introduction of the Typhoon.