Pediatric pulmonology · 2008
Slow-responders to IV beta2-adrenergic agonist therapy: defining a novel phenotype in pediatric asthma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carroll Christopher L, Schramm Craig M, Zucker Aaron R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: While aerosolized administration of beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)-AR) agonists is the mainstay of treatment for pediatric asthma exacerbations, the efficacy of intravenous (IV) delivery is controversial. Failure to demonstrate improved outcomes with IV beta(2)-AR agonists may be due to phenotypic differences within this patient population. Our hypothesis is that children who respond more slowly to IV beta(2)-AR agonist therapy comprise a distinct phenotype.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all children admitted to the ICU for status asthmaticus who were treated with IV terbutaline between December 2002 and September 2006.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight children were treated with IV terbutaline according to guidelines that adjusted the dose by clinical asthma score. After examining the histogram of duration of terbutaline infusions, a 48-hr cutoff was chosen to define responsiveness. Thirty-eight (49%) children were slow-responders by this definition. There were no significant differences in baseline asthma severity or severity on admission between the slow-responders and responders. Slow-responders required significantly higher total doses of IV terbutaline, higher maximum administration rates, and had longer ICU and hospital length of stay.
CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in outcomes between the responders and slow-responders without differences in acute or chronic illness severity. Other factors may have lead to slower response to IV beta(2)-agonist therapy.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all children admitted to the ICU for status asthmaticus who were treated with IV terbutaline between December 2002 and September 2006.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight children were treated with IV terbutaline according to guidelines that adjusted the dose by clinical asthma score. After examining the histogram of duration of terbutaline infusions, a 48-hr cutoff was chosen to define responsiveness. Thirty-eight (49%) children were slow-responders by this definition. There were no significant differences in baseline asthma severity or severity on admission between the slow-responders and responders. Slow-responders required significantly higher total doses of IV terbutaline, higher maximum administration rates, and had longer ICU and hospital length of stay.
CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in outcomes between the responders and slow-responders without differences in acute or chronic illness severity. Other factors may have lead to slower response to IV beta(2)-agonist therapy.