World neurosurgery · 2022
Novel Multiportal Approach to the Internal Auditory Canal for Hearing-Preserving Surgery: Feasibility Assessment in Dissections.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Butzer Tobias, Sheppard Sean C, Beckmann Sven, Wimmer Wilhelm, Caversaccio Marco, Anschuetz Lukas
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: State-of-the-art, minimally invasive endoscopic transcanal surgery of the internal auditory canal (IAC) sacrifices the cochlea with complete hearing loss. With a combination of the transcanal infracochlear and transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approaches, we aim to preserve hearing and enable minimally invasive surgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma. In this study, we investigate the anatomical indications and the feasibility of both approaches in dissections, in human whole head specimens.
METHODS: We operated whole head anatomical specimens with a four-handed technique, using the retrolabyrinthine approach as the main surgical corridor and the infracochlear approach for endoscopic visualization. We tested 4 different powered surgical systems. We collected intraoperative data on the size of the access windows, the surgical freedom, and the exposed area of the IAC. Finally, we evaluated the outcome in postoperative computed tomography scans.
RESULTS: Six out of 14 sides were anatomically suitable and qualified for the surgery based on preoperative computed tomography. In all attempted sides, the IAC could be reached and opened, leaving the ossicular chain and the labyrinth intact. 51%-75% of the length and 22%-40% of the circumference of the IAC could be exposed. All tested instruments were beneficial at different stages of the surgery. The four-handed technique enabled good maneuverability of the instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined multiportal approach to the IAC is feasible with a good surgical exposure and full anatomical preservation of hearing. State-of-the-art surgical instruments in specimens with suitable anatomy are sufficient to perform this approach.
METHODS: We operated whole head anatomical specimens with a four-handed technique, using the retrolabyrinthine approach as the main surgical corridor and the infracochlear approach for endoscopic visualization. We tested 4 different powered surgical systems. We collected intraoperative data on the size of the access windows, the surgical freedom, and the exposed area of the IAC. Finally, we evaluated the outcome in postoperative computed tomography scans.
RESULTS: Six out of 14 sides were anatomically suitable and qualified for the surgery based on preoperative computed tomography. In all attempted sides, the IAC could be reached and opened, leaving the ossicular chain and the labyrinth intact. 51%-75% of the length and 22%-40% of the circumference of the IAC could be exposed. All tested instruments were beneficial at different stages of the surgery. The four-handed technique enabled good maneuverability of the instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined multiportal approach to the IAC is feasible with a good surgical exposure and full anatomical preservation of hearing. State-of-the-art surgical instruments in specimens with suitable anatomy are sufficient to perform this approach.