Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2017
[Competing Validity of Developmental Diagnostic in School Entry Examination: Results of a Census in an Upper Bavarian District].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stich Heribert, Schlinkmann Kristin Maria, Mikolajczyk Rafael
Аннотация
AIM OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of the concurrent validity of a modified Bavarian model (BM) compared to the social-paediatric screening of developmental status for school entry (SOPESS) as a reference tool.
METHODS: A total of 407 preschoolers to be enrolled for the school year 2015 in an Upper Bavarian District were examined by BM and SOPESS. As a measure of the concurrent validity, the Kappa by Cohen (ĸ) was used.
RESULTS: The agreement of both instruments was moderate and was less pronounced for single dimensions than globally. The agreement in the dimensions of "prepositions" vs. "grammatism" (ĸ=0.46) was highest and for the dimensions "numbers and quantities" vs. "calculus" (ĸ=0.05). Stratification by age, gender, nationality and mode of the study programs had no significant influence on the strength of the effects.
CONCLUSION: The moderate agreement between the 2 instruments raises the question of the validity of BM used so far in school enrollment examinations.
METHODS: A total of 407 preschoolers to be enrolled for the school year 2015 in an Upper Bavarian District were examined by BM and SOPESS. As a measure of the concurrent validity, the Kappa by Cohen (ĸ) was used.
RESULTS: The agreement of both instruments was moderate and was less pronounced for single dimensions than globally. The agreement in the dimensions of "prepositions" vs. "grammatism" (ĸ=0.46) was highest and for the dimensions "numbers and quantities" vs. "calculus" (ĸ=0.05). Stratification by age, gender, nationality and mode of the study programs had no significant influence on the strength of the effects.
CONCLUSION: The moderate agreement between the 2 instruments raises the question of the validity of BM used so far in school enrollment examinations.