MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0043-116939

Медицинская библиотека · Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2017

[Competing Validity of Developmental Diagnostic in School Entry Examination: Results of a Census in an Upper Bavarian District].

Stich Heribert, Schlinkmann Kristin Maria, Mikolajczyk Rafael

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of the concurrent validity of a modified Bavarian model (BM) compared to the social-paediatric screening of developmental status for school entry (SOPESS) as a reference tool.

METHODS

A total of 407 preschoolers to be enrolled for the school year 2015 in an Upper Bavarian District were examined by BM and SOPESS. As a measure of the concurrent validity, the Kappa by Cohen (ĸ) was used.

RESULTS

The agreement of both instruments was moderate and was less pronounced for single dimensions than globally. The agreement in the dimensions of "prepositions" vs. "grammatism" (ĸ=0.46) was highest and for the dimensions "numbers and quantities" vs. "calculus" (ĸ=0.05). Stratification by age, gender, nationality and mode of the study programs had no significant influence on the strength of the effects.

CONCLUSION

The moderate agreement between the 2 instruments raises the question of the validity of BM used so far in school enrollment examinations.

Для цитирования: Stich Heribert, Schlinkmann Kristin Maria, Mikolajczyk Rafael. [Competing Validity of Developmental Diagnostic in School Entry Examination: Results of a Census in an Upper Bavarian District].. Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)). 2017. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116939.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.