DOI 10.1016/j.jasc.2022.05.002
Fine needle aspiration cytopathology of eccrine spiradenoma.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Eccrine spiradenoma (ES) is a rare benign cutaneous adnexal tumor. The aim of our study was to discuss the clinical presentation, cytomorphologic features, and differential diagnosis of a series of 3 cases of ES diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA).
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
The pathology databases were searched for cases of ES diagnosed by FNA and confirmed by follow-up surgical excision. FNA smears, cell blocks, and histologic sections were examined.
RESULTS
Three cases of ES that had presented as a soft tissue mass from 3 patients were reviewed. The sites included the left forearm, left leg, and left ankle. Cytology smears showed the presence of hypercellular 3-dimensional dense cell clusters and smaller loose cell aggregates, single cells, and bare nuclei. Most cells had round to oval nuclei, scant cytoplasm, and indistinct cell borders. A second population of cells had more spindled nuclei and were often dispersed as single cells. Scattered lymphocytes were present. Two cases showed the presence of pseudo-rosettes composed of hyaline globules of basement membrane-like material with a surrounding row of basaloid cells. None of the cases showed cytologic atypia, necrosis, or mitoses. Immunohistochemistry was used in 2 cases and showed positive staining with myoepithelial markers (smooth muscle actin, calponin, S100, and CK5). The cytology diagnoses were ES, basaloid cutaneous adnexal neoplasm, and suspicious for ES.
CONCLUSIONS
FNA cytopathology of ES demonstrated banal basaloid and spindle cells, lymphocytes, and infrequent metachromatic-stained hyaline globules. A specific diagnosis requires immunohistochemistry testing to avoid confusion with other cutaneous basaloid neoplasms.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.