Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2007
[Investigations concerning the head-trunk-coordination].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weikert S, Gabel P, Orawa H, Scholz P, Scherer H, Hölzl M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In the assessment of vertigo patients with suspected cervicocephalic somatosensory deficit, the studies published thus far have focused on reflectory systems like the cervico-ocular reflex or the postural systems. Our study examines the cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility of head and body coordination. We therefore introduce two preliminary test series: the "subjective zero chin-knee-angle of the occipital joints" and the "saccadic repositioning during trunk rotation".
METHODS: Subjective recordings of dizziness complaints were done using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory.
PATIENTS: The study population consisted of 24 patients with palpatory cervicocephalic somatosensory deficit (group I) and 23 patients with a central vestibular compensated unilateral vestibular deficit (group II). Twenty-two healthy patients served as controls. The aim of the study is to provide a detailed examination of the "subjective zero chin-knee-angle of the occipital joints" as well as a detailed discussion of "saccadic repositioning with trunk rotation" by three-dimensional videooculography (3D-VOG).
RESULTS: We were able to separate patients with a cervicocephalic somatosensory deficit with the first test procedure and differentiate them from groups II and III. The second test procedure shows a significant difference between groups I and III.
CONCLUSION: We conclude from the group difference that the recording of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility is a further indication of disturbed cervical proprioception.
METHODS: Subjective recordings of dizziness complaints were done using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory.
PATIENTS: The study population consisted of 24 patients with palpatory cervicocephalic somatosensory deficit (group I) and 23 patients with a central vestibular compensated unilateral vestibular deficit (group II). Twenty-two healthy patients served as controls. The aim of the study is to provide a detailed examination of the "subjective zero chin-knee-angle of the occipital joints" as well as a detailed discussion of "saccadic repositioning with trunk rotation" by three-dimensional videooculography (3D-VOG).
RESULTS: We were able to separate patients with a cervicocephalic somatosensory deficit with the first test procedure and differentiate them from groups II and III. The second test procedure shows a significant difference between groups I and III.
CONCLUSION: We conclude from the group difference that the recording of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility is a further indication of disturbed cervical proprioception.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedCervical VertebraeDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHead MovementsHumansKinesthesisMaleMeniere DiseaseMiddle AgedOrientationProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceRange of Motion, ArticularReflex, Vestibulo-OcularSaccadesVertigoVestibular DiseasesVestibule, LabyrinthVestibulocochlear Nerve DiseasesVideo Recording