The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2019
A comparative study of topical cantharidin and intralesional PPD to treat molluscum contagiosum.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khattab Fathia M, Nasr Mohamed M
Аннотация
Background: The immune system plays an important part in the clearance of molluscum contagiosum (MC) and, therefore, there has lately been a trend in using immunotherapy in MC therapy. Tuberculin-purified protein derivatives (PPDs) and topical cantharidin have not earlier been compared with their effectiveness in therapyAim: The aim of this research was to determine the effectiveness and security of intralesional immunotherapy in the therapy of MC with tuberculin PPD versus topical cantharidinPatients and methods: Twenty patients with various MC lesions received topical cantharidin as control (group A) and 20 MC patients received intralesional tuberculin PPD following prior intradermal immunity tests (group B).Results: Complete clearance of lesions was detected in 90.0% of patients in the cantharidin group; the partial response was detected in10.0% of the patients. However, in the PPD group, 85% of the patients showed a complete response and 15% showed a partial response, with no significant difference in the clinical response between the two groups. Mild side effects were detected.Conclusion: The results suggest that intralesional PPD and topical cantharidin 0.7% are effective and safe treatment modalities, but benefits of intralesional PPD is being a simple, effective and safe treatment with tolerable pain and can be an alternative treatment for multiple resistant types.