MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/wjs.12549

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of surgery · 2025

Different Methods of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal and Low Sigmoid Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Sun Qiang, Wu Han, Yao Jun, Wang Weijun, Xu Kai

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal and low sigmoid colon cancer usually requires an additional abdominal incision to remove specimen and make anastomosis which possibly lead to postoperative pain, incisional infection, incisional hernia, and scarring.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of different specimen extraction strategies in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal and low sigmoid colon cancer.

SETTINGS: Two-center study.

PATIENTS: Patients with rectum and low sigmoid colon cancer who accepted laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal and low sigmoid colon cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A cohort of 632 patients was enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline data among three groups. Each group contains 23 cases. Controlled group: specimens were extracted through abdominal incision. Pull-out-method group: specimens were extracted by transanal pull-through coloanal anastomosis. Turn-out-method group: specimens were extracted by turn-rectum-out method. Clinical effects of the three extraction techniques were compared.

RESULTS

There is no significant difference in surgery time, lymph nodes, blood loss, or incidence of postoperative complications in 1 week, hospital time, and financial cost (p > 0.05, respectively). Tumor diameter and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores of controlled group were significantly higher than those of the pull-out-method group and turn-out-method group (p < 0.05, respectively). Pull-out-method group and turn-out-method group had shorter time to ambulation and first flatus than the control group (p < 0.05, respectively). No difference in prognosis was found among the three groups (p > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS: Small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Pull-out-method and turn-out-method are safe and available in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal and low sigmoid colon cancer. Traditional abdominal incision strategy is suitable for larger specimens, whereas the pull-out-method strategy and turn-rectum-out strategy cause less trauma and have quicker recovery.

Для цитирования: Sun Qiang, Wu Han, Yao Jun, Wang Weijun, Xu Kai. Different Methods of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal and Low Sigmoid Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study.. World journal of surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12549.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.