MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No to hattatsu = Brain and development · 2006

[Child case of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy showing phagocytic myelinolysis and regenerative changes on electron microscopic analysis of the sural nerve].

Yamazaki Sawako, Yoshikawa Hideto, Tohyama Jun, Yamada Mitsunori

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We reported a 9-year-old boy with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) showing characteristic electron microscopic study findings on a sural nerve biopsy. He came to our hospital because of muscle weakness progressing slowly for 2 years. He developed distal muscle weakness and areflexia. Cerebrospinal fluid protein was elevated without pleocytosis. Moter conduction velocities were reduced. Partial conduction block and abnormal temporal dispersion were present. The electron microscopic findings on a sural nerve biopsy comprised both active demyelinating lesions, i.e., macrophages were peeling away the myelin lamellae and phagocytosing some myelin debris, and remyelinating lesions with onion bulb formations. Some findings mimic electron microscopic changes in Guillain-Barré syndrome, although tests for the known anti-ganglioside antibodies were negative. So, he was diagnosed as having definite CIDP and prednisolone with gamma-globulin infusion was effective to ameliorate his symptoms.

Для цитирования: Yamazaki Sawako, Yoshikawa Hideto, Tohyama Jun, Yamada Mitsunori. [Child case of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy showing phagocytic myelinolysis and regenerative changes on electron microscopic analysis of the sural nerve].. No to hattatsu = Brain and development. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.