MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5152/iao.2024.231140

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of international advanced otology · 2024

Do Otologists and Other Otolaryngologists Manage Single-Sided Deafness Differently?

Türe Nurullah, İncesulu Armağan, Mostafa Badr Eldin

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to survey the knowledge and treatment management practices for single-sided deafness (SSD) among different subspecialties of otolaryngology.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent via Google Sheets to members of the Turkish and Egyptian Otorhinolaryngology Societies between December 2021 and February 2022. For the statistical analysis, the respondents were divided into 3 groups as otologists, non-otologists, and residents at the department of otolaryngology-head and neck department.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between otologists and non-otologists in radiological imaging (child P = .469, adult P = .140) and preferred treatment method (child P = .546, adult P = .106). However, otolaryngologists showed significant differences in radiological evaluation (P <.001), vestibular evaluation (P = .000), and frequency of treatment options recommended for pediatric and adult SSD patients (P = .000).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in SSD diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation between otologists and non-otologists. However, when comparing pediatric and adult patients, there was a difference in the treatment management of SSD patients.

Для цитирования: Türe Nurullah, İncesulu Armağan, Mostafa Badr Eldin. Do Otologists and Other Otolaryngologists Manage Single-Sided Deafness Differently?. The journal of international advanced otology. 2024. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2024.231140.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.