MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jdsade/enae023

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2024

Literacy and signing deaf students: a multi-national scoping review.

Dostal Hannah, Scott Jessica, Gediel Ana, Vilhalva Shirley, Gasparin Camila

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Many literature reviews or other types of reviews (e.g., meta-analyses, scoping reviews) in deaf education research are focused upon primarily or exclusively research that is performed in U.S. contexts or English-speaking contexts only. However, research that is conducted in non-English-speaking, non-U.S. settings that may be more likely to be multilingual, has value for our understanding of how deaf students using multiple languages may develop literacy skills. The objective of this review was to explore the literature on literacy development with deaf learners conducted outside of English-speaking contexts that has been published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish. We identified 13 English-language articles, 9 Portuguese-language articles, and 0 Spanish articles that met inclusion criteria. From these articles, we glean important insights into the reading process, including the teaching of subskills of reading, writing instruction, early literacy experiences, and the potential relationship between signed languages and literacy. We also note the need for multiple, converging sources of evidence and the value of an asset-driven approach to understanding deaf learners.

Для цитирования: Dostal Hannah, Scott Jessica, Gediel Ana, Vilhalva Shirley, Gasparin Camila. Literacy and signing deaf students: a multi-national scoping review.. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/jdsade/enae023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.