Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2022
Evaluation of voriconazole related adverse events in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ertem Ozge, Tufekci Ozlem, Oren Hale, Tuncok Yesim, Ergon Mahmut Cem, Gumustekin Mukaddes
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic-guided dose selection are recommended for pediatric patients, safety of voriconazole is mostly monitored by clinical assessment. Having comprehensive knowledge of safety profile and distinguishing incidental events from the reactions that are truly related to voriconazole use are crucial for safer and uninterrupted treatment.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to address adverse reactions during the first month of voriconazole use by systematically evaluating retrospective records of all adverse events. Patients/Methods: It is a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who received voriconazole from 1 September 2010 to 1 September 2020. Severity of abnormal findings in medical records were systematically graded. Causality between voriconazole and the events was evaluated by Liverpool Causality Assessment Tool (LCAT), Naranjo Algorithm and World Health Organization Causality Assessment System. The events with possible or probable causal relation to voriconazole are classified as adverse reaction.
RESULTS: Records of 45 patients included in the study. The overall frequency of adverse reactions was 51.1%. Hepatobiliary laboratory adverse reactions identified in 48.9% of the patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 20.0%. Amylase and lipase elevation (2.2%), ventricular extra systoles (2.2%), hallucination and nightmares (2.2%) were other adverse reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatobiliary abnormalities were the most common adverse reactions and the most common cause of treatment discontinuation. For safer treatment in critically ill patients, the dose should be personalized. To clearly identify the accurate frequency and the causality of all adverse reactions, prospective studies with much larger sample size are needed.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to address adverse reactions during the first month of voriconazole use by systematically evaluating retrospective records of all adverse events. Patients/Methods: It is a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who received voriconazole from 1 September 2010 to 1 September 2020. Severity of abnormal findings in medical records were systematically graded. Causality between voriconazole and the events was evaluated by Liverpool Causality Assessment Tool (LCAT), Naranjo Algorithm and World Health Organization Causality Assessment System. The events with possible or probable causal relation to voriconazole are classified as adverse reaction.
RESULTS: Records of 45 patients included in the study. The overall frequency of adverse reactions was 51.1%. Hepatobiliary laboratory adverse reactions identified in 48.9% of the patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 20.0%. Amylase and lipase elevation (2.2%), ventricular extra systoles (2.2%), hallucination and nightmares (2.2%) were other adverse reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatobiliary abnormalities were the most common adverse reactions and the most common cause of treatment discontinuation. For safer treatment in critically ill patients, the dose should be personalized. To clearly identify the accurate frequency and the causality of all adverse reactions, prospective studies with much larger sample size are needed.