Mechanisms and clinical features of posterior border-zone infarcts.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Previous studies link posterior border-zone cerebral infarcts between the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) to hemodynamic causes, not embolism.
OBJECTIVE
To study the cause of these infarcts.
METHODS
We studied 21 patients (unilateral = 18, bilateral = 3) with acute, symptomatic posterior border-zone infarcts shown on CT or MRI to clarify stroke mechanisms. Patients were identified by review of CT and MRI logs and medical records during a 35-month period. An embolic mechanism was assigned when a source of embolism from either the heart, aorta, or parent large artery was present in the absence of intrinsic MCA or PCA disease. A hemodynamic mechanism was assigned when systemic hypotension was present.
RESULTS
Among patients with unilateral lesions, 10 were embolic (7 cardiac, 3 carotid), 7 were unknown, and one patient had vasospasm from a ruptured aneurysm. Visual field abnormalities predominated over motor, sensory, and language abnormalities. All patients with bilateral posterior border-zone lesions had perioperative hypotension. Prolonged lethargy, bilateral limb weakness, and cortical blindness were common.
CONCLUSIONS
Embolism, either cardiac or from the parent carotid artery, is the predominant stroke mechanism in unilateral posterior border-zone infarcts, not distal field perfusion failure. Bilateral posterior border-zone infarcts have a distinctive clinical presentation and are caused by systemic hypotension. Variability of irrigation of the major arteries, passage of emboli to border-zone areas, and decreased clearance of emboli in these areas explain the findings in the patients with unilateral lesions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.