Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2024
Improved Clinical Outcomes After Partial Repair and In Situ Biceps Tenodesis for the Treatment of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Efremov Kristian, Veale Nicholas J, Glass Evan A, Corban Jason, Le Kiet, Ghobrial Irene, Curtis Alan S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To present the short-term outcomes of arthroscopic in situ biceps tenodesis combined with partial rotator cuff repair in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) and minimal arthritis.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using prospectively maintained institutional databases to identify patients who had undergone a partial rotator cuff repair with in situ biceps tenodesis between March 2017 and December 2022. Patients were included if they (1) were diagnosed pre- or intraoperatively with MIRCT and (2) had complete preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The mean age of the study participants was 65 ± 7 years (range, 46-76) with 76.9% (n = 30) being male. The average follow-up was 21 ± 12 months (range, 12-58). Patients experienced significant improvement in visual analog scale for pain (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and subjective assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score (P < .001 for all comparisons). The pre- to postoperative improvement was 3.1 ± 2.3 for VAS, 27.5 ± 20.6 for ASES, and 31.3 ± 24.8 for SANE. Postoperatively, the average scores for VAS, ASES, and SANE were 1.3 ± 1.5, 79.5 ± 17.0, and 69.6 ± 20.1, respectively. Twenty-six patients (66.7%) achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS, 33 patients (84.6%) achieved the MCID for ASES, and 30 patients (76.9%) achieved the MCID for SANE.
CONCLUSIONS: Partial rotator cuff repair with in situ biceps tenodesis is an effective treatment for MIRCT, leading to significant improvements in patient-reported outcome and range-of-motion measures compared to preoperative conditions.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using prospectively maintained institutional databases to identify patients who had undergone a partial rotator cuff repair with in situ biceps tenodesis between March 2017 and December 2022. Patients were included if they (1) were diagnosed pre- or intraoperatively with MIRCT and (2) had complete preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The mean age of the study participants was 65 ± 7 years (range, 46-76) with 76.9% (n = 30) being male. The average follow-up was 21 ± 12 months (range, 12-58). Patients experienced significant improvement in visual analog scale for pain (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and subjective assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) score (P < .001 for all comparisons). The pre- to postoperative improvement was 3.1 ± 2.3 for VAS, 27.5 ± 20.6 for ASES, and 31.3 ± 24.8 for SANE. Postoperatively, the average scores for VAS, ASES, and SANE were 1.3 ± 1.5, 79.5 ± 17.0, and 69.6 ± 20.1, respectively. Twenty-six patients (66.7%) achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS, 33 patients (84.6%) achieved the MCID for ASES, and 30 patients (76.9%) achieved the MCID for SANE.
CONCLUSIONS: Partial rotator cuff repair with in situ biceps tenodesis is an effective treatment for MIRCT, leading to significant improvements in patient-reported outcome and range-of-motion measures compared to preoperative conditions.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.