Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025
A Question of Dose? Ultra-Low Dose Chest CT on Photon-Counting CT in People with Cystic Fibrosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Opitz Marcel, Welsner Matthias, Tazeoglu Halil I, Stehling Florian, Sutharsan Sivagurunathan, Westhölter Dirk, Büscher Erik, Taube Christian, Guberina Nika, Bos Denise, Drews Marcel, Rosok Daniel, Zensen Sebastian, Haubold Johannes, Umutlu Lale, Forsting Michael, Frings Marko
Аннотация
Objective: Chest computed tomography (CT) is a key component of the diagnostic assessment of people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) and is increasingly replacing chest radiography. Due to improvements in life expectancy, radiation exposure has become a growing concern in PwCF. Photon-counting CT (PCCT) has the potential to reduce the risk of radiation-induced malignancies while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to compare the radiation dose and image quality of low-dose high-resolution (LD-HR) and ultra-low-dose high-resolution (ULD-HR) CT protocols using PCCT in PwCF. Methods: This retrospective study included 72 PwCF, with 36 undergoing a LD-HR chest CT protocol and 36 receiving an ULD-HR protocol on a PCCT. The radiation dose and image quality were assessed by comparing the effective dose and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Three blinded radiologists evaluated the overall image quality, sharpness, noise, and assessability of the bronchi, bronchial wall thickening, and bronchiolitis using a five-point Likert scale. Results: The ULD-HR PCCT protocol reduced radiation exposure by approximately 65% compared with the LD-HR PCCT protocol (median effective dose: 0.19 vs. 0.55 mSv, p < 0.001). While LD-HR images were consistently rated higher than ULD-HR images (p < 0.001), both protocols maintained diagnostic significance (median image quality rating of "4-good"). The average SNR of the lung parenchyma was significantly lower with ULD-HR PCCT compared to LD-HR PCCT (p < 0.001). Conclusions: ULD-HR PCCT significantly reduced radiation exposure while maintaining good diagnostic image quality in PwCF. The effective dose of ULD-HR PCCT is only twice that of a two-plane chest X-ray, making it a viable low-radiation alternative for routine imaging in PwCF.