International journal of audiology · 2013
The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leensen Monique C J, Dreschler Wouter A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is the most reported occupational health disease in the Netherlands. The internet-based speech-in-noise test Earcheck (Albrecht et al, 2005; Leensen et al, 2011b) is designed to detect beginning NIHL and can be a valuable tool in occupational hearing health surveillance. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity of Earcheck compared to regular screening audiometry.
DESIGN: Subjects performed online Earcheck tests at home. The results are compared to a pure-tone screening audiogram obtained during regular occupational health examination. A subgroup performed the measurements twice to assess test-retest reliability.
STUDY SAMPLE: Two hundred and forty-nine male construction employees who recently had a periodic occupational health examination participated.
RESULTS: An average learning effect of -1.6 dB was found, that reduced with increasing test number. The test-retest variability was 1.6 dB. Sensitivity to detect beginning NIHL was 68%, with a specificity of 71%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although sensitivity and specificity values are only moderate, the broad internet application still promises a valuable addition to current practice. The relatively high learning effect indicates that more reliable results can be obtained after a longer test session. When this is put into practice some improvement in sensitivity and specificity may be expected as well.
DESIGN: Subjects performed online Earcheck tests at home. The results are compared to a pure-tone screening audiogram obtained during regular occupational health examination. A subgroup performed the measurements twice to assess test-retest reliability.
STUDY SAMPLE: Two hundred and forty-nine male construction employees who recently had a periodic occupational health examination participated.
RESULTS: An average learning effect of -1.6 dB was found, that reduced with increasing test number. The test-retest variability was 1.6 dB. Sensitivity to detect beginning NIHL was 68%, with a specificity of 71%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although sensitivity and specificity values are only moderate, the broad internet application still promises a valuable addition to current practice. The relatively high learning effect indicates that more reliable results can be obtained after a longer test session. When this is put into practice some improvement in sensitivity and specificity may be expected as well.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acoustic StimulationAdultAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdConstruction IndustryCross-Sectional StudiesEarly DiagnosisHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansInternetLearning CurveLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNoiseOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthPerceptual MaskingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSelf CareSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionSpeech Reception Threshold Test