Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2013
The role of delayed 18F-FDG PET imaging in the follow-up of patients with alveolar echinococcosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Caoduro Cécile, Porot Clémence, Vuitton Dominique A, Bresson-Hadni Solange, Grenouillet Frédéric, Richou Carine, Boulahdour Hatem, Blagosklonov Oleg
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: (18)F-FDG PET has already proved its usefulness in the follow-up of patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and has been proposed as a surrogate marker for therapeutic decisions on structured treatment interruption by benzimidazoles. However, standard PET acquisition (1 h after (18)F-FDG injection) lacks sensitivity, and the parasite may stay viable even if (18)F-FDG perilesional uptake has disappeared. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of delayed (18)F-FDG PET in the management of AE patients.
METHODS: During a 6-y period, 120 PET scans using (18)F-FDG were obtained for 70 AE patients treated by benzimidazoles, without selection. All patients underwent whole-body imaging on a PET/CT device 1 h after (18)F-FDG injection (4 MBq/kg), as well as an acquisition focused on the liver 3 h after the injection. We also analyzed the results of serologic tests.
RESULTS: Of the 57 scans considered negative at the standard acquisition, 13 (22.8%) became clearly positive at the delayed acquisition, and 6 (10.5%) became indeterminate at the delayed acquisition. Furthermore, 20 of 22 scans interpreted as indeterminate at the standard acquisition were considered positive because of clear perilesional (18)F-FDG uptake at the delayed acquisition. Thus, delayed acquisition changed the interpretation in 32.5% of cases. Moreover, of 44 patients treated by benzimidazoles and followed for more than 2 y by regular (18)F-FDG PET scans and specific AE serology, 11 (25%) presented pathologic (18)F-FDG uptake at the delayed acquisition but not at the standard one. In these patients, the treatment was continued despite negative results on standard (18)F-FDG PET and negative serologic findings. On the other hand, in 7 patients with negative delayed (18)F-FDG PET and negative serology, the treatment was safely interrupted with no evidence of disease recurrence during 8-37 mo (mean, 23 mo).
CONCLUSION: Our study clearly demonstrated that delayed (18)F-FDG PET greatly facilitated the differentiation between active and inactive liver lesions in AE patients. Also, our results strongly suggested that the combination of delayed (18)F-FDG PET and specific serology would prevent most of the recurrences observed after premature interruption of the treatment based only on standard (18)F-FDG PET.
METHODS: During a 6-y period, 120 PET scans using (18)F-FDG were obtained for 70 AE patients treated by benzimidazoles, without selection. All patients underwent whole-body imaging on a PET/CT device 1 h after (18)F-FDG injection (4 MBq/kg), as well as an acquisition focused on the liver 3 h after the injection. We also analyzed the results of serologic tests.
RESULTS: Of the 57 scans considered negative at the standard acquisition, 13 (22.8%) became clearly positive at the delayed acquisition, and 6 (10.5%) became indeterminate at the delayed acquisition. Furthermore, 20 of 22 scans interpreted as indeterminate at the standard acquisition were considered positive because of clear perilesional (18)F-FDG uptake at the delayed acquisition. Thus, delayed acquisition changed the interpretation in 32.5% of cases. Moreover, of 44 patients treated by benzimidazoles and followed for more than 2 y by regular (18)F-FDG PET scans and specific AE serology, 11 (25%) presented pathologic (18)F-FDG uptake at the delayed acquisition but not at the standard one. In these patients, the treatment was continued despite negative results on standard (18)F-FDG PET and negative serologic findings. On the other hand, in 7 patients with negative delayed (18)F-FDG PET and negative serology, the treatment was safely interrupted with no evidence of disease recurrence during 8-37 mo (mean, 23 mo).
CONCLUSION: Our study clearly demonstrated that delayed (18)F-FDG PET greatly facilitated the differentiation between active and inactive liver lesions in AE patients. Also, our results strongly suggested that the combination of delayed (18)F-FDG PET and specific serology would prevent most of the recurrences observed after premature interruption of the treatment based only on standard (18)F-FDG PET.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAnthelminticsAntigens, HelminthBenzimidazolesChildChild, PreschoolEchinococcosisEchinococcosis, HepaticEchinococcusFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsRecurrenceTime FactorsYoung Adult