Clinical scores fail to sufficiently identify children with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

AIMS: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of three clinical diagnostic criteria [Simon Broome (SB), MEDPED (MP), and guideline-derived (GL-EAS)] in identifying children with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) compared with genetic testing. The evaluation involved 1337 children with elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, focusing on the sensitivity and specificity of these clinical scores in detecting genetically confirmed FH cases.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

Clinical data were gathered by a self-reporting questionnaire. Clinical FH was defined in accordance with the tested FH score. Genetically confirmed heterozygous FH (HeFH) was defined by a (likely) pathogenic variant. Of the 1337 children undergoing genetic analysis, 211 showed a pathogenic FH mutation. Applying SB, MP, and GL-EAS criteria resulted in 210/1337, 125/1337, and 112/835 children being categorized to have FH clinically. The sensitivity of the clinical scores ranged from 0.44 to 0.54 with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.51-0.79. The specificity was 0.91-0.97 with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.89-0.91. Similar results were observed for the three clinical scores regarding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in subgroup analyses defined by gender, age (<10 years vs. ≥10 years), or weight [≥90th BMI (body mass index) percentile vs. <90th BMI percentile].

CONCLUSION

Clinical FH scores offer a high degree of specificity for FH diagnosis in children, but at the expense of low sensitivity. Specifically, half of the mutation-positive children in this study would have been missed for early diagnosis and preventive treatment. Given the widespread availability of affordable genetic testing, such analysis should be performed at a lower threshold than that indicated by these clinical scores.