The Angle orthodontist · 2006
Correlations between rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and the auditory apparatus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Villano Andrea, Grampi Barbara, Fiorentini Roberto, Gandini Paola
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on conductive hearing loss and maxillary constriction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 subjects (15 girls and 10 boys, aged between 6 years 8 months to 8 years 2 months) with conductive hearing loss and maxillary constriction were studied. Audiogram, tympanogram, and video-otoscopy were used to investigate the anatomical and physiological modifications of the bony and muscular structure of the maxilla and the auditory apparatus. The records were taken before maxillary expansion (T0), after expansion (7-14 days; T1), and after the retention period (8 months after expansion; T2).
RESULTS: After expansion, the audiometric records indicated an improvement in hearing levels for higher frequencies but not for lower ones. After the retention period, there was a functional improvement in all patients for all frequencies. The recovery of the tympanic membrane's elasticity occurred only after retention, as shown by the standard model tympanogram, which was still flat after expansion.
CONCLUSIONS: The auditory function in patients with conductive hearing loss may be corrected through correction of the palatal anatomy, which influences the muscular function of the tubal ostia and allows a normal activity of the tympanic membrane and the auditory apparatus. Positive effects on conductive hearing loss are possible additional benefits of RME treatment, but this does not indicate that patients with conductive hearing loss without an accompanying maxillary constriction should consider this as a treatment approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 subjects (15 girls and 10 boys, aged between 6 years 8 months to 8 years 2 months) with conductive hearing loss and maxillary constriction were studied. Audiogram, tympanogram, and video-otoscopy were used to investigate the anatomical and physiological modifications of the bony and muscular structure of the maxilla and the auditory apparatus. The records were taken before maxillary expansion (T0), after expansion (7-14 days; T1), and after the retention period (8 months after expansion; T2).
RESULTS: After expansion, the audiometric records indicated an improvement in hearing levels for higher frequencies but not for lower ones. After the retention period, there was a functional improvement in all patients for all frequencies. The recovery of the tympanic membrane's elasticity occurred only after retention, as shown by the standard model tympanogram, which was still flat after expansion.
CONCLUSIONS: The auditory function in patients with conductive hearing loss may be corrected through correction of the palatal anatomy, which influences the muscular function of the tubal ostia and allows a normal activity of the tympanic membrane and the auditory apparatus. Positive effects on conductive hearing loss are possible additional benefits of RME treatment, but this does not indicate that patients with conductive hearing loss without an accompanying maxillary constriction should consider this as a treatment approach.