MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215116007969

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2016

Optimal outcomes for hearing preservation in the management of small vestibular schwannomas.

Peng K A, Wilkinson E P

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a systematic review of the role of microsurgery, in relation to observation and stereotactic radiation, in the management of small vestibular schwannomas with serviceable hearing.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched for publications that included the terms 'vestibular schwannoma' and/or 'acoustic neuroma', occurring in conjunction with 'hearing'. Articles were manually screened to identify those concerning vestibular schwannomas under 1.5 cm in greatest dimension. Thereafter, only publications discussing both pre-operative and post-operative hearing were considered.

RESULTS

Twenty-six papers were identified. Observation is an acceptable strategy for small tumours with slow growth where hearing preservation is not a consideration. In contrast, microsurgery, including the middle fossa approach, may provide excellent hearing outcomes, particularly when a small tumour has begun to cause hearing loss. Immediate post-operative hearing usually predicts long-term hearing. Recent data on stereotactic radiation suggest long-term deterioration of hearing following definitive therapy.

CONCLUSION

In patients under the age of 65 years with small vestibular schwannomas, microsurgery via the middle fossa approach offers durable preservation of hearing.

Для цитирования: Peng K A, Wilkinson E P. Optimal outcomes for hearing preservation in the management of small vestibular schwannomas.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2016. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215116007969.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.