International journal of epidemiology · 2025
Bias in control selection associated with the use of rapid tests in influenza vaccine effectiveness studies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Poukka Eero, Murphy Caitriona, Mak Loretta, Cheng Samuel M S, Peiris Malik, Tsang Tim K, Sullivan Sheena G, Cowling Benjamin J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In test-negative design (TND) studies that use rapid tests to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE), a common concern is case-control misclassification due to imperfect diagnostic accuracy. An imperfect test can also fail to exclude from the control group people infected with other influenza types or other vaccine-preventable respiratory viruses. We investigated these biases while evaluating VE for the 2023/24 seasonal influenza vaccination.
METHODS: A TND study was conducted among outpatients aged ≥6 months of age who visited an outpatient clinic in Hong Kong between 15 December 2023 and 13 August 2024. VE was estimated for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)- and rapid-test-confirmed influenza A and B with exclusions of other types of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 based on either PCR or rapid test. Alternatively, for the exclusion of SARS-CoV-2, we adjusted the analysis with COVID-19 vaccination. VE was estimated by using logistic regression adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: In a study population of 1691 participants, VE against influenza A by PCR was 49% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26%-65%] after the exclusion of PCR-confirmed influenza B and SARS-CoV-2 controls. The corresponding VE against influenza B was 65% (95% CI 35%-81%). VE estimated by adjusting for COVID-19 vaccination status yielded similar estimates to these. When case-control status and exclusions from test-negative controls were determined by using the rapid test, VE was reduced by 5%age-15%age points.
CONCLUSION: In TND studies using rapid tests, reduced sensitivity affects both case-control classification and control group exclusions, potentially causing bias. New methods for these biases could help to adapt participatory cohorts for the monitoring of VE for influenza, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus.
METHODS: A TND study was conducted among outpatients aged ≥6 months of age who visited an outpatient clinic in Hong Kong between 15 December 2023 and 13 August 2024. VE was estimated for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)- and rapid-test-confirmed influenza A and B with exclusions of other types of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 based on either PCR or rapid test. Alternatively, for the exclusion of SARS-CoV-2, we adjusted the analysis with COVID-19 vaccination. VE was estimated by using logistic regression adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: In a study population of 1691 participants, VE against influenza A by PCR was 49% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26%-65%] after the exclusion of PCR-confirmed influenza B and SARS-CoV-2 controls. The corresponding VE against influenza B was 65% (95% CI 35%-81%). VE estimated by adjusting for COVID-19 vaccination status yielded similar estimates to these. When case-control status and exclusions from test-negative controls were determined by using the rapid test, VE was reduced by 5%age-15%age points.
CONCLUSION: In TND studies using rapid tests, reduced sensitivity affects both case-control classification and control group exclusions, potentially causing bias. New methods for these biases could help to adapt participatory cohorts for the monitoring of VE for influenza, COVID-19, and respiratory syncytial virus.