MedElevator
Войти в исследования Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2001
Effects of varying unilateral conductive hearing losses on speech-in-noise discrimination: an experimental study with implications for surgical correction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nia J, Bance M
Аннотация
HYPOTHESIS: Unilateral conductive hearing loss (HL) causes measurable disability in realistic hearing environments. The benefits of improving this loss depend both on the absolute level of final hearing and on hearing asymmetry.
BACKGROUND: Surgical success is often measured by the degree of change in the air-bone gap or in the air thresholds. The Glasgow Benefit Plot and the Belfast Rule of Thumb suggest that a given hearing gain will be of greater benefit if the postoperative thresholds in the worse ear are a <30-dB HL or within 15 dB of the contralateral ear. This assertion has important surgical implications, but few audiometric data supporting it currently exist.
METHODS: Speech-in-noise sound-field scores were measured in 16 normal volunteers at three presentation levels at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Two levels of unilateral conductive HL were simulated with earplugs, averaging 25-and 43-dB HL, respectively, and the effect on speech-in-noise scores was measured and analyzed.
RESULTS: Unilateral conductive HL is a disadvantage at lower sound intensities and low SNRs, but it can be compensated for by increasing volume or SNR. The benefits of improving unilateral conductive HL are greater if the final asymmetry is <25 dB and the final hearing threshold is <25 dB.
CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral conductive HL is a significant disadvantage at low SNRs or presentation volumes. The benefits of surgery to improve HL depend not only on the degree of hearing improvement but also on the final hearing threshold in both ears.
BACKGROUND: Surgical success is often measured by the degree of change in the air-bone gap or in the air thresholds. The Glasgow Benefit Plot and the Belfast Rule of Thumb suggest that a given hearing gain will be of greater benefit if the postoperative thresholds in the worse ear are a <30-dB HL or within 15 dB of the contralateral ear. This assertion has important surgical implications, but few audiometric data supporting it currently exist.
METHODS: Speech-in-noise sound-field scores were measured in 16 normal volunteers at three presentation levels at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Two levels of unilateral conductive HL were simulated with earplugs, averaging 25-and 43-dB HL, respectively, and the effect on speech-in-noise scores was measured and analyzed.
RESULTS: Unilateral conductive HL is a disadvantage at lower sound intensities and low SNRs, but it can be compensated for by increasing volume or SNR. The benefits of improving unilateral conductive HL are greater if the final asymmetry is <25 dB and the final hearing threshold is <25 dB.
CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral conductive HL is a significant disadvantage at low SNRs or presentation volumes. The benefits of surgery to improve HL depend not only on the degree of hearing improvement but also on the final hearing threshold in both ears.