MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1044/jslhr.4101.188

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 1998

Heritability of poor language achievement among twins.

Tomblin J B, Buckwalter P R

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАTwin StudyПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In order to examine the basis of familial associations with poor language achievement, 62 twinship pairs and 3 sets of triplets were studied in which at least one member presented poor oral language status in the absence of other developmental or sensory impairments. Rates of concordance for poor language were compared between the monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) pairs. Concordance for the MZ pairs was .96, whereas it was .69 for the DZ pairs. The DeFries-Fulker method for computing heritability of extreme scores was employed yielding a h2g of .45. Similar results were obtained for those pairs containing only children with performance IQs above 85, but with at least one member having language below -1 SD. A comparison of DZ twins with singleton sibling pairs with at least one affected member and of similar age showed that DZ twins were more similar with respect to language achievement than singleton pairs. Thus, twinning appeared to have influenced twin resemblance among those where at least one member presented poor language achievement. These results support the hypothesis that genetic factors contribute to the liability of poor language achievement in children who do not present other developmental or sensory disorders.

Для цитирования: Tomblin J B, Buckwalter P R. Heritability of poor language achievement among twins.. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR. 1998. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4101.188.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.