MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bjo.67.1.1

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of ophthalmology · 1983

Clinical and epidemiological features of adenovirus keratoconjunctivitis in London.

Darougar S, Grey R H, Thaker U, McSwiggan D A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Ninety-eight patients were studied. Ninety were consecutive patients who were isolation-positive for adenovirus, and 8, who were associated with a hospital outbreak of adenovirus serotype 8 infection, developed characteristic features of infection but were isolation-negative. The ratio of males to females was 2 to 1, and most patients were aged 20 to 39. Adenovirus serotypes 3, 7, and 8 were isolated from 86% of patients, and serotypes 2, 4, 5, 11, 15, and 15/29 from the remaining 14%. Adenovirus serotype 7 was more commonly isolated from patients under the age of 19 and was Not isolated during winter. Sources of infection could be identified in 36% of patients and included contact with upper respiratory tract of ocular infections, a hospital outbreak, and a recent visit to a swimming pool. Associated systemic disease was detected in 47% of patients, most of whom had upper respiratory tract infection. The most severe and prolonged conjunctivitis was caused by serotypes 5 and 8. Most patients developed epithelial punctate keratitis. Subepithelial punctate keratitis, which was once-considered to be a characteristic feature of adenovirus serotype 8, developed in cases of serotype 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 infection.

Для цитирования: Darougar S, Grey R H, Thaker U, McSwiggan D A. Clinical and epidemiological features of adenovirus keratoconjunctivitis in London.. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1983. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.67.1.1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.