MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5754/hge11052

Медицинская библиотека · Hepato-gastroenterology · 2011

Two cases of gastric Anisakiasis for which oral administration of a medicine containing wood creosote (Seirogan) was effective.

Sekimoto Mitsugu, Nagano Hiroaki, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki, Watanabe Taro, Katsu Kenichi, Doki Yuichiro, Mori Masaki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Anisakiasis is a disease characterized by an abrupt onset of sharp epigastric pain, which occurs typically a few hours after eating raw or undercooked seafood. Anisakiasis was a Japanese localized disease in the past, however has become an illness of concern in many countries where eating Japanese style raw or undercooked seafood has become popular. At present, the only effective treatment is an endoscopic removal of the nematode. Development of an effective medicine is expected. We report two cases of Anisakiasis, the symptoms of which were ameliorated after the administration of an over-the-counter (OTC) medicine containing wood creosote (Seirogan). Also, we examined the in vitro effect of the Seirogan on the viability of the nematode. In the two cases, the strong epigastric pain was subdued promptly after oral intake of the Seirogan. The exposure of Seirogan suppressed the viability of Anisakis Larva in vitro dose dependently. The oral administration of medicine containing wood creosote might be effective as a first aid to ameliorate the symptoms of Anisakiasis.

Для цитирования: Sekimoto Mitsugu, Nagano Hiroaki, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki, Watanabe Taro, Katsu Kenichi, Doki Yuichiro, Mori Masaki. Two cases of gastric Anisakiasis for which oral administration of a medicine containing wood creosote (Seirogan) was effective.. Hepato-gastroenterology. 2011. DOI: 10.5754/hge11052.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.