MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106260

Медицинская библиотека · Cognition · 2025

Competition for selection drives the nature of bilingual language control: Picture naming, but not reading aloud, triggers global inhibition of the dominant language.

Gavino Maria Fernanda, Malul Tehila, Prior Anat, Degani Tamar, Gollan Tamar H

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The current study tested the hypothesis that bilingual language control mechanisms vary depending on the extent of competition for selection. Forty-eight English-dominant Spanish-English bilinguals switched languages in production of single words, which was elicited with picture naming versus reading aloud in counterbalanced order. Results revealed some key similarities across tasks including: a) significant switch costs, b) larger switch costs in the dominant when compared to the nondominant language (i.e., in English versus in Spanish), and c) only the nondominant language benefitted from repetition. However, switch costs were larger in picture naming than in reading aloud, and only the picture naming task exhibited the strongest signature effect of inhibition of the dominant language in the form of reversed language dominance. These results provide evidence that language control mechanisms adapt to meet varying task demands depending on the nature and extent of competition for selection between languages.

Для цитирования: Gavino Maria Fernanda, Malul Tehila, Prior Anat, Degani Tamar, Gollan Tamar H. Competition for selection drives the nature of bilingual language control: Picture naming, but not reading aloud, triggers global inhibition of the dominant language.. Cognition. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106260.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.