MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11606-022-07795-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of general internal medicine · 2022

The Impact of Hearing Loss and Its Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life Utility: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Borre Ethan D, Kaalund Kamaria, Frisco Nicholas, Zhang Gloria, Ayer Austin, Kelly-Hedrick Margot, Reed Shelby D, Emmett Susan D, Francis Howard, Tucci Debara L, Wilson Blake S, Kosinski Andrzej S, Ogbuoji Osondu, Sanders Schmidler Gillian D

МетаанализСистематический обзорПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss significantly impacts health-related quality of life (QoL), yet the effects of current treatments on QoL utility remain uncertain. Our objective was to describe the impact of untreated and treated hearing loss on QoL utility to inform hearing healthcare policy.

METHODS

We searched databases for articles published through 02/01/2021. Two independent reviewers screened for articles that reported elicitation of general QoL utility values for untreated and treated hearing loss health states. We extracted data and quality indicators from 62 studies that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Included studies predominately used observational pre/post designs (61%), evaluated unilateral cochlear implantation (65%), administered the Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI3; 71%), and were conducted in Europe and North America (84%). In general, treatment of hearing loss improved post-treatment QoL utility when measured by most methods except the Euro-QoL 5 dimension (EQ-5D). In meta-analysis, hearing aids for adult mild-to-moderate hearing loss compared to no treatment significantly improved HUI3-estimated QoL utility (3 studies; mean change=0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07 to 0.14) but did not impact EQ-5D-estimated QoL (3 studies; mean change=0.0; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.04). Cochlear implants improved adult QoL utility 1-year post-implantation when measured by the HUI3 (7 studies; mean change=0.17; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.23); however, pediatric VAS-estimated QoL utility was non-significant (4 studies; mean change=0.12; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.25). The quality of included studies was limited by failure to report missingness of data and low survey response rates. Our study was limited by heterogeneous study populations and designs.

FINDINGS: Treatment of hearing loss significantly improves QoL utility, and the HUI3 and VAS were most sensitive to improvements in hearing. Improved access to hearing healthcare should be prioritized. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42021253314.

Для цитирования: Borre Ethan D, Kaalund Kamaria, Frisco Nicholas, Zhang Gloria, Ayer Austin, Kelly-Hedrick Margot, Reed Shelby D, Emmett Susan D, Francis Howard, Tucci Debara L, Wilson Blake S, Kosinski Andrzej S, Ogbuoji Osondu, Sanders Schmidler Gillian D. The Impact of Hearing Loss and Its Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life Utility: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.. Journal of general internal medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07795-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.