Research in developmental disabilities · 2021
A comparison of formal and informal methods for assessing language and cognition in children with Rett syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ward Callie, Chiat Shula, Townend Gillian S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Opinions about the cognitive and receptive language skills of people with Rett syndrome (RTT) range from severe intellectual impairment to near-normal development. Assessment is challenging because most are non-verbal, with no purposeful hand use. Clarkson et al. (2017) adapted the Mullen Scales of Early Learning for use with eye gaze technology (MSEL-A/ET) for people with RTT.
AIMS: To investigate and compare the performance of children with RTT on formal and newly-designed informal assessments of language and cognition using eye gaze/tracking technology.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Ten children with RTT aged 4:0-6:8 were assessed on the MSEL-A/ET for Visual Reception (VR) and Receptive Language (RL), and standard MSEL for Expressive Language (EL). Informal assessments of the same skills were embedded in activities such as reading and cake-decorating.
OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Standard scores on MSEL-A/ET VR and RL subtests ranged from 'very low' to 'above average'. All children scored 'very low' on standard EL assessment. Informal assessments added information about EL, with children producing 1-3 word utterances and a range of communicative functions through an eye gaze device.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Combining low-tech augmentative and alternative communication, eye gaze technology, informal activities and formal assessment, yields greater insight into children's abilities. This is important in informing suitable support and education for the individual.
AIMS: To investigate and compare the performance of children with RTT on formal and newly-designed informal assessments of language and cognition using eye gaze/tracking technology.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Ten children with RTT aged 4:0-6:8 were assessed on the MSEL-A/ET for Visual Reception (VR) and Receptive Language (RL), and standard MSEL for Expressive Language (EL). Informal assessments of the same skills were embedded in activities such as reading and cake-decorating.
OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Standard scores on MSEL-A/ET VR and RL subtests ranged from 'very low' to 'above average'. All children scored 'very low' on standard EL assessment. Informal assessments added information about EL, with children producing 1-3 word utterances and a range of communicative functions through an eye gaze device.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Combining low-tech augmentative and alternative communication, eye gaze technology, informal activities and formal assessment, yields greater insight into children's abilities. This is important in informing suitable support and education for the individual.