MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.11.004

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology · 2006

Wilbrand's knee: does it exist?

Lee Joung H, Tobias Samuel, Kwon Jeong-Taik, Sade Burak, Kosmorsky Gregory

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

In 1904, Hermann Wilbrand reported that nasal ON fibers form a loop into the contralateral ON, subsequently referred to as Wilbrand's knee. He had further theorized that a lesion affecting Wilbrand's knee would develop a distinct visual field defect characterized by an ipsilateral central scotoma with a contralateral superotemporal visual field defect. We present clinical evidence that disputes the existence of Wilbrand's knee.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 3 patients whose ONs were divided at the ON-chiasm junction is presented. Two patients had an ONS meningioma and the other patient had sarcoidosis of the ON. Resection of the lesion and the ON up to the nerve-chiasm junction was done to prevent the disease from extending into the OC and the contralateral ON. The patients had detailed neuro-ophthalmologic evaluations preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

After the resection of the ON at the ON-chiasm junction in the 3 patients, junctional scotoma could not be detected by visual perimetry.

CONCLUSION

No clinical perimetric evidence was found to support the existence of Wilbrand's knee in the anterior visual pathway.

Для цитирования: Lee Joung H, Tobias Samuel, Kwon Jeong-Taik, Sade Burak, Kosmorsky Gregory. Wilbrand's knee: does it exist?. Surgical neurology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.11.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.