MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.148

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of general psychiatry · 2011

A multisite study of the clinical diagnosis of different autism spectrum disorders.

Lord Catherine, Petkova Eva, Hus Vanessa, Gan Weijin, Lu Feihan, Martin Donna M, Ousley Opal, Guy Lisa, Bernier Raphael, Gerdts Jennifer, Algermissen Molly, Whitaker Agnes, Sutcliffe James S, Warren Zachary, Klin Ami, Saulnier Celine, Hanson Ellen, Hundley Rachel, Piggot Judith, Fombonne Eric, Steiman Mandy, Miles Judith, Kanne Stephen M, Goin-Kochel Robin P, Peters Sarika U, Cook Edwin H, Guter Stephen, Tjernagel Jennifer, Green-Snyder Lee Anne, Bishop Somer, Esler Amy, Gotham Katherine, Luyster Rhiannon, Miller Fiona, Olson Jennifer, Richler Jennifer, Risi Susan

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Best-estimate clinical diagnoses of specific autism spectrum disorders (autistic disorder, pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified, and Asperger syndrome) have been used as the diagnostic gold standard, even when information from standardized instruments is available.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the relationships between behavioral phenotypes and clinical diagnoses of different autism spectrum disorders vary across 12 university-based sites.

DESIGN

Multisite observational study collecting clinical phenotype data (diagnostic, developmental, and demographic) for genetic research. Classification trees were used to identify characteristics that predicted diagnosis across and within sites.

SETTING

Participants were recruited through 12 university-based autism service providers into a genetic study of autism.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2102 probands (1814 male probands) between 4 and 18 years of age (mean [SD] age, 8.93 [3.5] years) who met autism spectrum criteria on the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and who had a clinical diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Best-estimate clinical diagnoses predicted by standardized scores from diagnostic, cognitive, and behavioral measures.

RESULTS

Although distributions of scores on standardized measures were similar across sites, significant site differences emerged in best-estimate clinical diagnoses of specific autism spectrum disorders. Relationships between clinical diagnoses and standardized scores, particularly verbal IQ, language level, and core diagnostic features, varied across sites in weighting of information and cutoffs.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical distinctions among categorical diagnostic subtypes of autism spectrum disorders were not reliable even across sites with well-documented fidelity using standardized diagnostic instruments. Results support the move from existing subgroupings of autism spectrum disorders to dimensional descriptions of core features of social affect and fixated, repetitive behaviors, together with characteristics such as language level and cognitive function.

Для цитирования: Lord Catherine, Petkova Eva, Hus Vanessa, Gan Weijin, Lu Feihan, Martin Donna M, Ousley Opal, Guy Lisa, Bernier Raphael, Gerdts Jennifer, Algermissen Molly, Whitaker Agnes, Sutcliffe James S, Warren Zachary, Klin Ami, Saulnier Celine, Hanson Ellen, Hundley Rachel, Piggot Judith, Fombonne Eric, Steiman Mandy, Miles Judith, Kanne Stephen M, Goin-Kochel Robin P, Peters Sarika U, Cook Edwin H, Guter Stephen, Tjernagel Jennifer, Green-Snyder Lee Anne, Bishop Somer, Esler Amy, Gotham Katherine, Luyster Rhiannon, Miller Fiona, Olson Jennifer, Richler Jennifer, Risi Susan. A multisite study of the clinical diagnosis of different autism spectrum disorders.. Archives of general psychiatry. 2011. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.148.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.