Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026
Assessing the Effectiveness, Adherence and Attrition of Smartphone-Based Mental Health Interventions in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jabs Maya, Thompson Matthew, Linardon Jake, Messer Mariel, Wade Tracey D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Mental health challenges are prevalent among university students, many of whom face barriers to accessing traditional psychological services. Smartphone-delivered mental health applications offer a scalable intervention option, but evidence regarding their effectiveness and engagement remains limited. This systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis examined clinical and engagement outcomes of app-based mental health interventions in university students.
METHOD: Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global and Scopus were searched from inception to 27 October 2025 (initial search: 2 April 2025). Randomised controlled trials were synthesised using multilevel meta-analysis and non-randomised designs were narratively synthesised. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Outcomes included depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, disordered eating and body image, alongside attrition and adherence.
RESULTS: A total of k = 122 studies were included. Interventions produced significant effects across all outcomes: anxiety (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.14, 0.30]), depression (d = 0.25, 95% CI [0.16, 0.33]), stress (d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.19, 0.38]), well-being (d = 0.47, 95% CI [0.16, 0.78]), disordered eating (d = 0.29, 95% CI [0.06, 0.52]) and body image (d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.06, 0.48]). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes. Attrition was moderate (17.0%, 95% CI [13.5, 21.2]) and adherence varied (70.0%, 95% CI [54.0, 82.0]). Personalization significantly moderated depression outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: App-based interventions demonstrate small-to-moderate benefits for university student mental health, though heterogeneity and engagement challenges limit impact. Future research should prioritise personalised, transdiagnostic approaches and standardised engagement reporting, with greater focus on eating- and appearance-related outcomes.
METHOD: Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global and Scopus were searched from inception to 27 October 2025 (initial search: 2 April 2025). Randomised controlled trials were synthesised using multilevel meta-analysis and non-randomised designs were narratively synthesised. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Outcomes included depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, disordered eating and body image, alongside attrition and adherence.
RESULTS: A total of k = 122 studies were included. Interventions produced significant effects across all outcomes: anxiety (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.14, 0.30]), depression (d = 0.25, 95% CI [0.16, 0.33]), stress (d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.19, 0.38]), well-being (d = 0.47, 95% CI [0.16, 0.78]), disordered eating (d = 0.29, 95% CI [0.06, 0.52]) and body image (d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.06, 0.48]). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes. Attrition was moderate (17.0%, 95% CI [13.5, 21.2]) and adherence varied (70.0%, 95% CI [54.0, 82.0]). Personalization significantly moderated depression outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: App-based interventions demonstrate small-to-moderate benefits for university student mental health, though heterogeneity and engagement challenges limit impact. Future research should prioritise personalised, transdiagnostic approaches and standardised engagement reporting, with greater focus on eating- and appearance-related outcomes.