MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10899-023-10266-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gambling studies · 2023

A Structural Equation Model to Explain Gambling Problem Severity in Adolescents with an Integrated Perspective.

Donati Maria Anna, Vehkalahti Kimmo, Capitanucci Daniela, Primi Caterina

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To be effective in the prevention of adolescent problem gambling, it is fundamental to enhance knowledge about the antecedents of gambling problem severity and the mechanisms through which these dimensions are related to problematic gambling behavior. This study aimed at testing how selected cognitive (correct knowledge of gambling and gambling-related cognitive distortions) and affective (positive economic perception of gambling and expectation and enjoyment and arousal towards gambling) variables are related to gambling frequency and gambling problem severity. Problem gambling was conceptualized as Gambling Disorder symptoms according to the last edition of the DSM. Participants were 447 Italian high school students (68% males, mean age = 16.8, SD = 0.84). Structural Equation Models (SEMs) conducted with adolescent gamblers attested two indirect effects from knowledge to problem gambling: One through gambling-related cognitive distortions and one through gambling frequency. Overall, results confirmed that adolescent problem gambling is a complex phenomenon explained by multiple and different factors. Practical implications for preventive efforts are discussed.

Для цитирования: Donati Maria Anna, Vehkalahti Kimmo, Capitanucci Daniela, Primi Caterina. A Structural Equation Model to Explain Gambling Problem Severity in Adolescents with an Integrated Perspective.. Journal of gambling studies. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-023-10266-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.