MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02762107

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of pediatrics · 2001

Childhood bacterial meningitis in Pondicherry, South India.

Sahai S, Mahadevan S, Srinivasan S, Kanungo R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To identify causative bacteria from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of children with meningitis and analyse various clinical and laboratory parameters.

METHODS

Over a 20 month period, September 1994 to April 1996, one hundred episodes of acute bacterial meningitis in children aged 1 month-12 years were studied in a tertiary urban hospital in South India. Organisms were isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in 35% of cases. Among infants and children, the two major pathogens were H. influenzae (17%) and S. pneumoniae (12%).

RESULTS

The illness at presentation was mild in 13% and severe in 36% of cases. The association of subdural effusion in children with Salmonella Gp B meningitis merits attention. The overall case fatality rate was 25%. S. pneumoniae had a higher case fatality rate than Salmonella Gp B and H. influenzae (50% vs 17% vs 12%). All the three infants below 3 months of age with S. pneumoniae meningitis died. On analysis of selected clinical and laboratory features by discriminant analysis, CSF culture was the significant (P = 0.02) variable in relation to outcome. In pneumococcal meningitis, CSF WBC count was a highly significant variable in relation to outcome (Wilk's Lambda 0.15, F = 24.64, P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Prevention of infections due to H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae should be given higher priority.

Для цитирования: Sahai S, Mahadevan S, Srinivasan S, Kanungo R. Childhood bacterial meningitis in Pondicherry, South India.. Indian journal of pediatrics. 2001. DOI: 10.1007/bf02762107.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.