Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2008
The option of Linac-based radiosurgery in a Gamma Knife radiosurgery center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stern Robin L, Perks Julian R, Pappas Conrad T, Boggan James E, Chen Allan Y
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Due to the fundamental differences in treatment delivery, linear-accelerator-based radiosurgery can be complementary to Gamma Knife (GK) for intracranial lesions. We reviewed the effect of adding GK to an existing linear accelerator (Linac)-based radiosurgery practice and analyzed case selections for the two modalities.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: UC Davis Medical Center installed a Leksell Gamma Knife Model C in October 2003 to supplement an established Linac-based radiosurgery program. Radiosurgery indications for the 15 months before and after installation were compared.
RESULTS: Radiosurgery cases expanded by twofold from 68 patients before GK installation to 139 after, with 106 treated by GK and 33 by Linac. Besides a major increase for trigeminal neuralgia and a general growth for acoustic neuroma, meningioma and brain metastases, case numbers for glioma and arteriovenous malformation (AVM) remained stable. Considering case selections for Linac, glioma decreased from 28 to 18%, while meningioma and metastases increased from 9 to 21% and 38-46%, respectively. The Linac patients receiving fractionated treatment also increased from 37 to 61%.
CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of patients were treated with GK, a significant proportion was judged to be suited for Linac treatment. This latter group included particularly patients who benefit from fractionated therapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: UC Davis Medical Center installed a Leksell Gamma Knife Model C in October 2003 to supplement an established Linac-based radiosurgery program. Radiosurgery indications for the 15 months before and after installation were compared.
RESULTS: Radiosurgery cases expanded by twofold from 68 patients before GK installation to 139 after, with 106 treated by GK and 33 by Linac. Besides a major increase for trigeminal neuralgia and a general growth for acoustic neuroma, meningioma and brain metastases, case numbers for glioma and arteriovenous malformation (AVM) remained stable. Considering case selections for Linac, glioma decreased from 28 to 18%, while meningioma and metastases increased from 9 to 21% and 38-46%, respectively. The Linac patients receiving fractionated treatment also increased from 37 to 61%.
CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of patients were treated with GK, a significant proportion was judged to be suited for Linac treatment. This latter group included particularly patients who benefit from fractionated therapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Brain NeoplasmsCaliforniaFollow-Up StudiesHumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeuroma, AcousticOncology Service, HospitalParticle AcceleratorsRadiation OncologyRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSurgery Department, HospitalTreatment OutcomeTrigeminal Neuralgia