MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001200006

Медицинская библиотека · Cadernos de saude publica · 2006

[Evaluation of coverage by a neonatal screening program for hemoglobinopathies in the Recôncavo region of Bahia, Brazil].

Silva Wellington dos Santos, Lastra Angel, de Oliveira Silviene Fabiana, Klautau-Guimarães Nazaré, Grisolia Cesar Kope

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In 2001, government ruling n. MS 822/01 by the Brazilian Ministry of Health made neonatal screening mandatory for hemoglobinopathies, with special focus on sickle cell disease, the most common hemoglobinopathy in Brazil. Bahia is the State of Brazil with the highest prevalence of this disease. The current paper reports on the prevalence of hemoglobin variants HbS and HbC, which cause sickle cell disease, in the cities of Cachoeira, Maragogipe, and São Félix, Bahia State. The overall proportion of carriers for the two forms of hemoglobin was 13%. From 2001 to 2003, the neonatal screening rate decreased from 82.6% to 46.4% in Cachoeira and increased from 37.0% to 56.2% in Maragogipe. Thus, only about one-half of children are being tested in these cities. The findings show that the public health care system in these cities is poorly prepared to screen for sickle cell disease in newborns and that there was a lack of health care personnel to follow up on newly diagnosed sickle cell patients or carriers of the sickle cell trait.

Для цитирования: Silva Wellington dos Santos, Lastra Angel, de Oliveira Silviene Fabiana, Klautau-Guimarães Nazaré, Grisolia Cesar Kope. [Evaluation of coverage by a neonatal screening program for hemoglobinopathies in the Recôncavo region of Bahia, Brazil].. Cadernos de saude publica. 2006. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001200006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.