Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2016
Photodynamic Therapy for Pseudophakic Eyes Compared to Eyes With Cataract.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mimouni Karin, Mimouni Michael, Eldar Ido, Axer-Siegel Ruth, Kramer Michal, Shani Ludmila, Weinberger Dov
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) plays a role in the treatment of chorioretinal conditions. The purpose of this study was to compare vPDT outcomes between cataractous and pseudophakic eyes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study of consecutive patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with vPDT, cataract and pseudophakic eyes were compared for number and timing of vPDT treatments, duration of follow-up, angiographic features, and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
RESULTS: Overall, 103 eyes (n = 95) were included in the final analysis; 44 eyes in the cataract group and 59 eyes in the pseudophakic group. No significant difference in change in BCVA (P = .19) or leakage-free CNV lesions (P = .58) was found between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of vPDT for nAMD, there was no significant difference between eyes with cataract and pseudophakic eyes. It seems that cataract does not clinically alter the effect of vPDT. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:1132-1136.].
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study of consecutive patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with vPDT, cataract and pseudophakic eyes were compared for number and timing of vPDT treatments, duration of follow-up, angiographic features, and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
RESULTS: Overall, 103 eyes (n = 95) were included in the final analysis; 44 eyes in the cataract group and 59 eyes in the pseudophakic group. No significant difference in change in BCVA (P = .19) or leakage-free CNV lesions (P = .58) was found between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of vPDT for nAMD, there was no significant difference between eyes with cataract and pseudophakic eyes. It seems that cataract does not clinically alter the effect of vPDT. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:1132-1136.].