Transplantation · 2005
Assessment of factors determining graft size in transplant of cadaver kidneys from child donors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Feltran Luciana de Santis, Nogueira Paulo Cesar Koch, Bocaletti Ana Paula, Christofalo Dejaldo Marcos Jesus, Ajzen Sergio Aron, Pacheco-Silva Alvaro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Kidneys from child donors are very efficient at adapting to the recipient organism. This research aims to verify the size of kidney grafts from pediatric donors after transplant and to identify factors responsible for the size attained by these kidneys. Moreover, it aims to seek relationships between size and function of the transplanted pediatric kidney.
METHODS: Seventy-seven renal transplants performed at least 6 months earlier, with cadaver donor 15 years old or younger, had ultrasound measurements of the graft and renal function assessment. Potential factors for graft volume were analyzed using bivariate analysis, followed by multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: After a follow up of 4.2+/-3.3 years posttransplant, the grafts presented the following range of measures: length 10.61+/-1.13 cm, width 4.67+/-0.84 cm, and depth 4.76+/-0.99 cm. Graft volumes were 126.62+/-47.76 cm. Bivariate analysis showed that (1) age of both donor and recipient at transplantation; (2) sex of recipient; (3) occurrence of acute rejection episodes were statistically significant. After multivariate analysis, age and sex of recipients were the only significant factors influencing graft volume; child kidneys reached greater volumes when transplanted into adult and male individuals. Larger volume kidneys presented significantly more proteinuria. No difference was evident with regard to creatinine clearance values or urinary retinol binding protein among kidneys of differing sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: The size of the recipient (age and sex) is the main factor responsible for volumes achieved by kidneys from pediatric donors. The volume attained by these kidneys demonstrated no relationship with glomerular or tubular function of the organ.
METHODS: Seventy-seven renal transplants performed at least 6 months earlier, with cadaver donor 15 years old or younger, had ultrasound measurements of the graft and renal function assessment. Potential factors for graft volume were analyzed using bivariate analysis, followed by multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: After a follow up of 4.2+/-3.3 years posttransplant, the grafts presented the following range of measures: length 10.61+/-1.13 cm, width 4.67+/-0.84 cm, and depth 4.76+/-0.99 cm. Graft volumes were 126.62+/-47.76 cm. Bivariate analysis showed that (1) age of both donor and recipient at transplantation; (2) sex of recipient; (3) occurrence of acute rejection episodes were statistically significant. After multivariate analysis, age and sex of recipients were the only significant factors influencing graft volume; child kidneys reached greater volumes when transplanted into adult and male individuals. Larger volume kidneys presented significantly more proteinuria. No difference was evident with regard to creatinine clearance values or urinary retinol binding protein among kidneys of differing sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: The size of the recipient (age and sex) is the main factor responsible for volumes achieved by kidneys from pediatric donors. The volume attained by these kidneys demonstrated no relationship with glomerular or tubular function of the organ.