Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of pathogens isolated from surgical wound infections in tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for post-surgical site infections is crucial amid rising cases and antibiotic resistance.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate demographic factors, the occurrence of surgical wound site infections, pathogens associated with these infections, and antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated pathogens.
SUBJECTS AND
METHODS
A cross-sectional study including 384 patients suffering from post-surgical site infections was conducted in tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan over six months.
RESULTS
The study participants' ages ranged from 7 to 74 years old, with a mean age (±SD) of 30.4 (±9.5) years, and 44.8% of them were female. Among 384 study subjects, bacterial pathogens were isolated from 295 (76.80%). The frequency of gram-negative was 58.75%, whereas the frequency of gram-negative was 41.25%. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), (19%), Staphylococcus aureus (Staph aureus) (18.0%), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) (18.0%) were the most common organisms isolated from wound infections. A significant association was present between occupation and culture sensitivity with a p-value of 0.01. Most of the culture-positive population had appendectomy site infection (92.90%). MRSA had the highest sensitivity to vancomycin (89.8%) and the highest resistance to gentamicin (85.7%). Staph. aureus was most sensitive to imipenem (80%) and most resistant to gentamicin (68.4%). E. coli was most sensitive to imipenem (100%) and most resistant to ceftazidime (90%).
CONCLUSION
This study has provided a thorough description of the prevalence of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, as well as their relationships to wound type and demographic parameters.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.