MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/14992027.2021.1900611

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of audiology · 2021

Sudden deafness: a comparison between age groups.

Hung Wei-Chen, Lin Kuei-You, Cheng Po-Wen, Young Yi-Ho

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study compared sudden deafness (SD) cases in 20-year age bands to investigate their causes and treatment outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

STUDY SAMPLES: 178 unilateral SD patients were divided into four 20-year age-groups, namely Groups I (aged 0-19 years, n = 6), II (aged 20-39 years, n = 33), III (aged 40-59 years, n = 63), and IV (aged 60-79 years, n = 76).

METHODS

An inner ear test battery and/or serology assay were performed.

RESULTS

Incidence of SD in relation to overall neurotological cases did not significantly differ among the four groups. Groups I and II showed two or three audiographic patterns, while Groups III and IV had six audiographic patterns indicating that the aetiology of Groups I and II may be of the same origin, while Groups III and IV had multiple aetiologies. The hearing improvement rate was significantly higher in Groups III (62%) and IV (62%) than in Groups I (16%) and II (33%).

CONCLUSION

SD inevitably affects individuals of all ages. Significant differences in the audiographic patterns and speculative causes may account for various outcomes of treatment in each 20-year age band. Those SD patients aged 40-59 and 60-79 years showed significantly better treatment outcomes than those aged 0-19 and 20-39 years.

Для цитирования: Hung Wei-Chen, Lin Kuei-You, Cheng Po-Wen, Young Yi-Ho. Sudden deafness: a comparison between age groups.. International journal of audiology. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1900611.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.