MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1044/2020_aja-20-00041

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of audiology · 2021

Telefitting of Nucleus Cochlear Implants: A Feasibility Study.

Takano Kenichi, Kaizaki Aya, Kimura Ayami, Nomura Kazuaki, Yamazaki Norikazu, Shintani Tomoko, Himi Tetsuo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Purpose This study aims to describe the recommended equipment and procedures required for successful telefitting, based on our experience, document and evaluate patient satisfaction with telefitting, and assess its clinical usefulness and address the existing issues. Method Twenty (seven children and 13 adults) individuals who lived far from cochlear implant (CI) centers and who were Nucleus CI users underwent conventional face-to-face fitting and telefitting. We examined the participants' subjective satisfaction and cost and time saved with the telefitting experience. Results The telefitting sessions lasted for an average of 16 min. Majority of the participants responded positively to the telefitting experience. Eighty percent (16/20) of the participants were satisfied with the new procedure, and 85% of them agreed to use telefitting again. Conclusions The results of our feasibility study suggest that telefitting was well received by CI users and is a viable alternative to local MAPping, even in young children with CIs. Although there are some limitations in terms of adaptability, telefitting could be an effective means of delivering CI service to remote locations.

Для цитирования: Takano Kenichi, Kaizaki Aya, Kimura Ayami, Nomura Kazuaki, Yamazaki Norikazu, Shintani Tomoko, Himi Tetsuo. Telefitting of Nucleus Cochlear Implants: A Feasibility Study.. American journal of audiology. 2021. DOI: 10.1044/2020_aja-20-00041.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.