DOI 10.1016/s0385-8146(02)00114-1
Improved outcomes with early vocal fold medialization for vocal fold paralysis after thoracic surgery.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine the clinical impact of early versus late surgical therapy for new onset unilateral vocal cord paralysis (UVCP) after thoracic surgery.
STUDY
DESIGN
Patients diagnosed with new onset UVCP after esophagectomy, pneumonectomy or pulmonary lobectomy were reviewed to determine the incidence of pneumonia, need for postoperative bronchoscopy and length of stay (LOS). Comparisons were made between patients undergoing early (< or = 4 days after thoracic procedure) versus late rehabilitation (> or = 5 days after thoracic procedure) of their UVCP with vocal cord medialization.
RESULTS
Some 86 patients (27 esophagectomies, 43 pneumonectomies and 16 lobectomies) with new onset UVCP were examined. A total of 32 patients (37.2%) underwent early vocal cord medialization and 54 (62.8%) underwent late repair. The pneumonia rate for patients undergoing early vocal cord medialization (6.3%) was significantly lower than the rate for vocal cord medialization (37.0%, P=0.001, chi(2)). Early medialization patients required fewer postoperative bronchoscopies (mean number of bronchoscopies, 0.26) than late medialization patients (mean bronchoscopies, 0.94, P=0.013). The median LOS was significantly decreased for early versus late medialization patients in both pneumonectomy (reduction in LOS of 8 days) and lobectomy groups (reduction in LOS of 7 days).
CONCLUSIONS
Early vocal cord medialization decreases the pneumonia rate, the requirement for postoperative bronchoscopies and the LOS for patients suffering from new onset UVCP after thoracic surgery.
SIGNIFICANCE: Consideration should be given to early medialization for new onset UVCP when medically sound.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.