MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/019459980112400609

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2001

Long-term results of the first 500 cases of acoustic neuroma surgery.

Wiet R J, Mamikoglu B, Odom L, Hoistad D L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study focuses on 2 outcome results after surgical intervention for acoustic neuroma: (1) facial nerve status, and (2) hearing preservation.

STUDY

DESIGN

A total of 484 patients with an acoustic neuroma.

RESULTS

Postoperative facial nerve outcomes were significantly different (P < 0.001) according to the size of the tumors. Tumor size had even more influence on the immediate postoperative results. In addition, statistical significance (P < 0.05) was demonstrated in comparing facial nerve outcomes with the surgeon's surgical experience. We also noted that as the patient's age increases, the likelihood for facial dysfunction may increase for all postoperative intervals. The overall success rate of retaining useful hearing was 27% (26 of 95). Class A hearing was retained in 66% (10 of 15) of cases operated on through middle fossa approach in the last 5 years.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that tumor size and surgeon's experience are the most significant factors influencing the facial nerve status and hearing outcome after removal of acoustic neuroma.

Для цитирования: Wiet R J, Mamikoglu B, Odom L, Hoistad D L. Long-term results of the first 500 cases of acoustic neuroma surgery.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1177/019459980112400609.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.