MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199812)20:8<699::aid-hed7>3.0.co;2-p

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 1998

Multivariate survival analysis of 128 cases of oral cavity minor salivary gland carcinomas.

Lopes M A, Santos G C, Kowalski L P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Minor salivary gland carcinomas are uncommon tumors of the oral cavity. The decision regarding treatment remains controversial. The main objective of this paper is to report on the survival results of 128 patients treated in a single institution.

METHODS

Tumor sites were: hard palate (62 cases), tongue (16 cases), buccal mucosa (13 cases), soft palate (12 cases), and other sites (25 cases). The most common histology was mucoepidermoid carcinoma (76 cases). Clinically metastatic lymph nodes were palpable in 21 patients. Cox regression technique was used to construct the mathematical-statistical models, aiming to predict the risks of recurrence and of death as functions of the different variables under study.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 85.9% and 87.7% in the groups of patients treated by surgery or combined therapy. There were significant differences in survival rates according to N stage, bone involvement, tumor histology, sex, and type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the recurrences were at the site of primary tumor; neck metastases were rare at presentation and after initial treatment. Prognosis involves several factors related to stage, histology, and treatment.

Для цитирования: Lopes M A, Santos G C, Kowalski L P. Multivariate survival analysis of 128 cases of oral cavity minor salivary gland carcinomas.. Head & neck. 1998. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199812)20:8<699::aid-hed7>3.0.co;2-p.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.