MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0003489414546605

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2014

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in children with tinnitus.

Levi Eric, Bekhit Elhamy K, Berkowitz Robert G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Tinnitus in adults is generally investigated by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to rule out the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Acoustic neuroma is rare in children and, therefore, the role of MRI in children with tinnitus is unclear. This study was undertaken to determine the value of MRI in the investigation of tinnitus in children.

METHODS

Retrospective study of children younger than 18 years who underwent MRI for the investigation of tinnitus over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were identified, but there were only 34 who had also undergone audiologic assessment. Among the 25 patients with normal audiology, MRI abnormalities were present in 9, but these were all thought to be nonspecific. Nine patients had abnormal audiograms and the MRI was abnormal in 4 of these cases, which included 3 children who were found to have multiple sclerosis.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging would appear to be mandatory in the investigation of tinnitus in children who are found to have sensorineural hearing loss, particularly to rule out the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Although our study does not support the routine use of MRI in children with normal audiology, the numbers in our series are too small for a conclusive recommendation.

Для цитирования: Levi Eric, Bekhit Elhamy K, Berkowitz Robert G. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in children with tinnitus.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0003489414546605.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.