MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.26699

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2021

Assessment of different induction chemotherapy regimens in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Meta-analysis.

Guan Hui, He Yan, Su Yonglin, Wei Zhigong, Liu Zheran, Wang Jingjing, He Ling, Mu Xiaoli, Li Ruidan, Hu Xiaolin, Peng Xingchen

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicities among different induction chemotherapy regimens in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for literature up to September 16, 2019. Two researchers independently selected the articles, evaluated the quality of the literature, and extracted and analyzed the data.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in survival outcomes, mucositis, or gastrointestinal adverse events among the four regimens. The probability of GP being the best induction scheme to improve OS was 43.7%. The completion rate of concurrent chemotherapy with the GP regimen was significantly reduced than the other three regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival outcomes of the four regimens in LA-NPC were comparable. Considering only OS, GP showed the highest probability of improving the survival of LA-NPC, while it also affected the completion of concurrent chemotherapy.

Для цитирования: Guan Hui, He Yan, Su Yonglin, Wei Zhigong, Liu Zheran, Wang Jingjing, He Ling, Mu Xiaoli, Li Ruidan, Hu Xiaolin, Peng Xingchen. Assessment of different induction chemotherapy regimens in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Meta-analysis.. Head & neck. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26699.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.