MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · International surgery · 2007

Combined radical retropubic prostatectomy and abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for locally invasive rectal cancer as a less invasive surgery: report of a case.

Sugita Hiroki, Egami Hiroshi, Yokoyama Yoshiki, Suyama Ken-ichi, Ogawa Michio

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The optimal therapy for carcinoma of the rectum with invasion of the prostate gland has not been established. For a patient who has rectal carcinoma invading into the prostate and seminal vesicles and not invading into any other pelvic viscera, we performed combined radical retropubic prostatectomy and abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with reconstruction of the urinary tract by anastomosis of the ureter to the bladder. En bloc excision yielded negative surgical margins. After the operation, the patient had an infection of the abdominal wound and leakage of the anastomosis of the urethra to the bladder. These complications were treated conservatively and improved without becoming critical. The patient now has satisfactory postoperative function of voiding. This technique obviates the need for urinary diversion or urinary reconstruction such as the neobladder in the case of total pelvic exenteration. We consider this procedure is of benefit for improving the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer invading into the prostate.

Для цитирования: Sugita Hiroki, Egami Hiroshi, Yokoyama Yoshiki, Suyama Ken-ichi, Ogawa Michio. Combined radical retropubic prostatectomy and abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for locally invasive rectal cancer as a less invasive surgery: report of a case.. International surgery. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.